When I browse through upcoming reads on goodreads, I kind of internally flinch away when I see MARVELOUS INTRIGUING TITLE (#1). More often then not, I'm noticing, this (#1) intrudes subtly but insistently upon my subconscious, radiating do-not-read vibes. I guess that (#1) scares me away.
It's not that I'm against series, particularly. How can you be against books? So that's not it, it can't be it. I love the Harry Potter series. I love Garth Nix's Seventh Tower Series. I can do it, I can read through seven books about one character that take years and years to come out. I can stick by a series.
I can.
It's just, I sort of resent the occasions where, by picking up one book, you've signed yourself unknowingly over to having to pick up the next one or two or five, in order to get a satisfying conclusion.
I sort of resent reading a very strong first book that would be pretty much great if it didn't have a cop-out, scrambled together ending that inserts a ready-made conflict solely so the BRAVE MAIN CHARACTER can embark on another adventure.
I sort of resent reading a filler second book that only leads to a third book that's not even as good as the first one.
I guess I can deal with the series trend when the first book has a satisfying, fulfilling conclusion, when it can be read as a standalone. And yet, I'm human, I'm a reader. I'm far from invulnerable to that pang that hits you when you see the next book out in the bookstore, or it's shiny new cover of shininess, or that main character you loved gracing the next new book with her visage of awesome.
Much too often, in the same manner I'm drawn inevitably to a box of unwrapped and tantalizing chocolate*, I can't resist. I pick up the next book, shelling over that $18, and float home wrapped up in a cocoon of excited expectancy. But more often than not, I'm in for a few hours of frustration.
I'm not inherently opposed to spending another book's time with the same character. I don't have problems with the idea of a continuing story. It's just, too often, that next book isn't worth it. It sort of ruins the memory of that first book in my mind, colliding and enmeshing with it, until I can't separate the two reading experiences.
I guess I get too attached. From the HUNGER GAMES trilogy to WHERE SHE WENT (sequel to IF I STAY) to THE WAKE TRILOGY I've felt that disappointment. And then I wonder, why?
Why can't I just leave it at one? Why can't the author just leave it at one?
So now, I'm very hesitant to pick up any book that has (#1) tacked on to its title. I know it's judgmental and horrible of me in a way, but I feel like it's the only way I can save myself from disappointment. I dislike feeling disappointed, after being left to wait a year or two before the cliffhanger ending is resolved. I dislike feeling like the characters have morphed into unpleasant caricatures of themselves, dislike feeling like the true ending (the last book in the series) didn't quite live up to the beginning, the first book.
I understand the logistics behind the abundance of YA series, the money behind it and why publishers love it so much. And some stories are legitimate in that they're too big to tell in one book, like LORD OF THE RINGS. This series epidemic is by no means a YA-only occurrence; I feel torn to shreds by George R.R. Martin's devilish, scheming mind as he cavorts away from any sort of resolution, leaving countless cliffhangers in his A SONG OF ICE AND FIRE series.**
It's just, this feeling as a reader--that you can't trust books because of that fateful (#1); that you have to be cautious; that you must not pick up the second or the third unless you want you reading soul to be crushed into let-down smithereens--isn't a nice one to have. It makes me a little sad, and most of all, so weary.
*Or cookies. I can't resist those either.
**Don't get me wrong. I love A SONG OF ICE AND FIRE, but those last two books? A bit of a let down. However, it's definitely a case of a story too big for one book.
Olivia · 712 weeks ago
My recent post A Better Life
inwhichagirlreads 55p · 712 weeks ago
Becca C. · 712 weeks ago
Although I like the idea of companion novels. Not true sequels, in that they have separate main characters and separate stories, so they can be enjoyed by fans of the first book (who might meet some old favourite characters) but can also be read by new readers.
inwhichagirlreads 55p · 712 weeks ago
Also, I heartily agree with your blog post. Where are all the standalone books? There are plenty of contemporary standalones, but in the paranormal/fantasy/dystopian genres, it seems impossible to write anything but a trilogy.
Jessy · 712 weeks ago
inwhichagirlreads 55p · 712 weeks ago
Tere Kirkland · 712 weeks ago
If you want to read a good standalone, I liked The Space Between (Not yet released?). If you feel you want to get into a story that's too big to be told in one book, but at least had a satisfying story arc, that would be Daughter of Smoke and Bone (also not yet released?). Have a good weekend!
inwhichagirlreads 55p · 712 weeks ago
Ditto on the cliffhanger endings and barely being able to wait a week for TV shows haha.
M.J. Horton · 712 weeks ago
My recent post Friday Find (2)
inwhichagirlreads 55p · 712 weeks ago
Nina · 712 weeks ago
I would love to read more stand alone novels, seriously LOVE, but I can't find them in the bookstore! So sad! :(
Jenn 64p · 712 weeks ago
When do I read series? I read them if, and only if, I fall in love with a character(s). And it has to be REALLY, REALLY in love or else I'm not going to remember him/her in a year, which seems to be the usual time span between releases. As for the greatest reason why I DON'T read series is that I'm scared of disappointment. I'm happy with where the first book left off (i.e. Shiver, Brightly Woven -- despite all those cries for a sequel, Incarceron) or I'm scared the next one will just be a "filler." For first books that have a dead ending, I kind of hold a grudge against them and say FINE, I'M NOT CONTINUING ON WITH YOU. D:< lol.
Ultimately, (#1)'s don't scare me because I know I can stop and be fine with that (sometimes through the power of imagination).
ANYWAYS, sorry for rambling! I think I just kind of brain-spewed. I'm glad you're kinda, sorta back, Meg/choco/awesome-almost-college-girl. <3
My recent post Review: Haunting Violet by Alyxandra Harvey
@ginad129 · 712 weeks ago
Harry Potter and Narnia are well thought out. They have connections between the books that make them stand independently AND work well together as a fuller, more complete story arc.
But many series are just what you are talking about: It's selling well, and I want to make more money, so I will write more books with this character. It's easier than building up a new series with a new character. I already know this one will sell.
To reiterate: never feel bad putting a series down. If it's not worth your time, then just leave it alone :)
trillianbooks 15p · 712 weeks ago
deleted8578366 88p · 712 weeks ago
And you know, I do find myself appreciating stand-alones even more (back then I used to be so annoyed with them--I was always interested in revisiting the characters since I loved them so!) and companion novels; oh, and there's always the two-book series. Sometimes two books are all that's needed for a story to be completed :)
My recent post Giveaway: Bunheads by Sophie Flack!
Nomes · 711 weeks ago
weird, as i dont even read them, haha.
but then, some series i want to go one forever (like, say, jaclyn moriarty's...)
anyways, it seems like overkill, some of them. then again, publishers must be digging them. or, well, someones reading them ;)
Cara 85p · 711 weeks ago
Maximum. Ride.
Completely loved the kickass bird kids in the first book, less in the second, more in the third. Then the fourth book took a swan dive off a skyscraper and yet I've read two more after it. I finally put my foot down about the seventh installment, but I still see it winking at me sometimes in B&N.
I'm a big contemporary fan and because they're mostly stand alones I don't read too many series, but I still follow some religiously {i.e. The Mortal Instruments, The Infernal Devices, The Curse Workers series}. I guess for me it all depends on the series and if it's going to be two books long or twelve. I can't handle the Series That Never End.
LOVE this post. :)
My recent post Review: Past Perfect by Leila Sales!
@chicfitgeek · 711 weeks ago
Midnyte Reader · 710 weeks ago
Celtic Traveler · 710 weeks ago
My recent post The Rogue Crew Quotes II
Ronni · 710 weeks ago
I miss good, standalone books. There are some out there, but series are definitely taking over and maybe it's a way for publishing companies to guarantee dividends, etc.
Trilogies are a bit easier to handle, but some series have been going on for years and there are dozens of books included. It's hard to keep up and it's usually hard to get all of the books.
My recent post Uglee Pikcher Meme II
Ronni · 710 weeks ago
My recent post Uglee Pikcher Meme II
Kelan O'Connell · 678 weeks ago
As an Indie Author of a book that's considered a stand-alone, I get nervous about breaking away and writing for an entirely new set of characters. And yet, that's exactly what I plan to do. So, reading this post and comments that reveal how some avid readers and bloggers are getting tired of the whole series scene, makes me feel a bit better.
Yes, one day I plan to come back to the characters people have embraced, and I'm glad they want to read more with them, but frankly, for the moment, their story is done. I'll catch up with them down the line, once their lives have progressed and there are developments worth reporting, but there are other characters and other stories to be told. I guess the brand I'm creating is something of a cross between a stand-alone and a series. Time will tell.
jainia · 447 weeks ago
Anamika · 447 weeks ago
jack smith · 304 weeks ago
123.hp.com/setup
office.com/setup