8.12.2011

I'm kind of tired of series.

I've noticed something lately: when it comes to series, I'm feeling reading fatigued.

When I browse through upcoming reads on goodreads, I kind of internally flinch away when I see MARVELOUS INTRIGUING TITLE (#1). More often then not, I'm noticing, this (#1) intrudes subtly but insistently upon my subconscious, radiating do-not-read vibes. I guess that (#1) scares me away.

It's not that I'm against series, particularly. How can you be against books? So that's not it, it can't be it. I love the Harry Potter series. I love Garth Nix's Seventh Tower Series. I can do it, I can read through seven books about one character that take years and years to come out. I can stick by a series.

I can.

It's just, I sort of resent the occasions where, by picking up one book, you've signed yourself unknowingly over to having to pick up the next one or two or five, in order to get a satisfying conclusion.

I sort of resent reading a very strong first book that would be pretty much great if it didn't have a cop-out, scrambled together ending that inserts a ready-made conflict solely so the BRAVE MAIN CHARACTER can embark on another adventure.

I sort of resent reading a filler second book that only leads to a third book that's not even as good as the first one.

I guess I can deal with the series trend when the first book has a satisfying, fulfilling conclusion, when it can be read as a standalone. And yet, I'm human, I'm a reader. I'm far from invulnerable to that pang that hits you when you see the next book out in the bookstore, or it's shiny new cover of shininess, or that main character you loved gracing the next new book with her visage of awesome.

Much too often, in the same manner I'm drawn inevitably to a box of unwrapped and tantalizing chocolate*, I can't resist. I pick up the next book, shelling over that $18, and float home wrapped up in a cocoon of excited expectancy. But more often than not, I'm in for a few hours of frustration.

I'm not inherently opposed to spending another book's time with the same character. I don't have problems with the idea of a continuing story. It's just, too often, that next book isn't worth it. It sort of ruins the memory of that first book in my mind, colliding and enmeshing with it, until I can't separate the two reading experiences.

I guess I get too attached. From the HUNGER GAMES trilogy to WHERE SHE WENT (sequel to IF I STAY) to THE WAKE TRILOGY I've felt that disappointment. And then I wonder, why?

Why can't I just leave it at one? Why can't the author just leave it at one?

So now, I'm very hesitant to pick up any book that has (#1) tacked on to its title. I know it's judgmental and horrible of me in a way, but I feel like it's the only way I can save myself from disappointment. I dislike feeling disappointed, after being left to wait a year or two before the cliffhanger ending is resolved. I dislike feeling like the characters have morphed into unpleasant caricatures of themselves, dislike feeling like the true ending (the last book in the series) didn't quite live up to the beginning, the first book.

I understand the logistics behind the abundance of YA series, the money behind it and why publishers love it so much. And some stories are legitimate in that they're too big to tell in one book, like LORD OF THE RINGS. This series epidemic is by no means a YA-only occurrence; I feel torn to shreds by George R.R. Martin's devilish, scheming mind as he cavorts away from any sort of resolution, leaving countless cliffhangers in his A SONG OF ICE AND FIRE series.**

It's just, this feeling as a reader--that you can't trust books because of that fateful (#1); that you have to be cautious; that you must not pick up the second or the third unless you want you reading soul to be crushed into let-down smithereens--isn't a nice one to have. It makes me a little sad, and most of all, so weary.

*Or cookies. I can't resist those either.
**Don't get me wrong. I love A SONG OF ICE AND FIRE, but those last two books? A bit of a let down. However, it's definitely a case of a story too big for one book.




Comments (26)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I don't know about most of the other authors out there, but the sole reason my first book has a sequel is because I didn't want it to have a cliche, cop-out ending (which is going to bring me problems when I start writing the sequel later this year, because there is absolutely no way I'm writing a third. That would just be wrong, for all of the reasons you've outlined here and more.)
My recent post A Better Life
1 reply · active 712 weeks ago
No, a sequel makes sense sometimes, when--as I said--the story is too big for one book. I don't know. Know that this post is just a (perhaps unreasonable) rant of sadness.
I just wrote a post similar to this, and I feel the same way as you. I'm calling for more great standalone books!

Although I like the idea of companion novels. Not true sequels, in that they have separate main characters and separate stories, so they can be enjoyed by fans of the first book (who might meet some old favourite characters) but can also be read by new readers.
1 reply · active 712 weeks ago
I have a more positive view of companion novels as well. Because that means the story is complete in the first novel.

Also, I heartily agree with your blog post. Where are all the standalone books? There are plenty of contemporary standalones, but in the paranormal/fantasy/dystopian genres, it seems impossible to write anything but a trilogy.
I agree with you on a lot of what you said. I have to be very picky now when picking up a new series. I used to always have to finish a series because I couldn't just stop without knowing how it ends. But now I've learned to just let it go. I'm not wasting my time when there are so many other good books out there I could be reading.
1 reply · active 712 weeks ago
What I'm feeling now exactly. Sigh. It's so darn hard learning to let it go, however.
LOL, I was just about to post something like this, too. These days I hear the word "stand-alone" and I'm all over it! I get that some stories are just too big (the wip might be that kind of story, yikes!) to tell in one book, but I like there to be at least some resolution at the end, even if it leads to the next story arc. I hate hate hate cliffhanger endings. Unless the next book is coming out in 3 months, I don't want to wait that long. I can barely wait a week for more True Blood.

If you want to read a good standalone, I liked The Space Between (Not yet released?). If you feel you want to get into a story that's too big to be told in one book, but at least had a satisfying story arc, that would be Daughter of Smoke and Bone (also not yet released?). Have a good weekend!
1 reply · active 712 weeks ago
Thank you for the recommendations!

Ditto on the cliffhanger endings and barely being able to wait a week for TV shows haha.
Choco, I am the exact opposite. Hehe. I adore series and just going with that character on their journey for several hundred pages. I feel like I grow with them a bit more that way. There's also the fandom that comes out of books that are series. How you have something to discuss, theorize, and wait for with a big group of people (that amount grows with each wait). Hee. I'm actually more likely to pick up a book if it's a series.
My recent post Friday Find (2)
1 reply · active 712 weeks ago
I'm really glad that you posted this, because you reminded me about the good things about the series, when I was only focusing on the bad. I do like seeing characters evolving. and I do love fandoms :D
Yeah, I kind of feel the same way. I've been reading books that are the first book in a series and some of them are awesome and some of them are just okay. so I read a couple of the reviews for the sequals and some where very positive reviews and some where very negative. I decided that if the first book was just okay, nothing spectacular, I won't read the sequal. I want my books to blow me away. (In a good way of course!)
I would love to read more stand alone novels, seriously LOVE, but I can't find them in the bookstore! So sad! :(
I looked back, and I actually posted a weekly debate on the "dominance of series" in January 2010 with pretty much the same points. Though definitely not as eloquently, haha. But, yes, I've had this problem for FOREVER. I'm not getting tired of series, I grew tired of series about 3 years ago, once I got past middle school. Why? I'm not sure. I think it might be partially because of the "independence streak," where in addition to controlling my life, I also want to control stories to an extent. If I like the end of book 1, I'm not reading another one. Yet I honestly don't know why exactly or when exactly I just kind of stopped reading series.

When do I read series? I read them if, and only if, I fall in love with a character(s). And it has to be REALLY, REALLY in love or else I'm not going to remember him/her in a year, which seems to be the usual time span between releases. As for the greatest reason why I DON'T read series is that I'm scared of disappointment. I'm happy with where the first book left off (i.e. Shiver, Brightly Woven -- despite all those cries for a sequel, Incarceron) or I'm scared the next one will just be a "filler." For first books that have a dead ending, I kind of hold a grudge against them and say FINE, I'M NOT CONTINUING ON WITH YOU. D:< lol.

Ultimately, (#1)'s don't scare me because I know I can stop and be fine with that (sometimes through the power of imagination).

ANYWAYS, sorry for rambling! I think I just kind of brain-spewed. I'm glad you're kinda, sorta back, Meg/choco/awesome-almost-college-girl. <3
My recent post Review: Haunting Violet by Alyxandra Harvey
Generally I'm fine with series' if they were always planned as a series (and like you say, when there's enough story to warrent more books). I hate it when it's really clear that the author wrote the first book, it was a hit and then they write another one based on this
I've had this feeling even before I was a blogger, lol. Although before I didn't know that the fate of a book or book series depended on the publishers and whatnot. I have been avoiding some books because they're Part One of a trilogy and even for books that I really enjoyed (like Nightshade), I found that I could wait patiently for the next two books to come out (the sequel's BEEN out but I haven't even thought about going to the library or buying it). I like to think that this avoidance is me being smart--that way, once the entire series is available, I won't have to wait in anticipation for another year or two xD That's what I did with the Vampire Academy series :)

And you know, I do find myself appreciating stand-alones even more (back then I used to be so annoyed with them--I was always interested in revisiting the characters since I loved them so!) and companion novels; oh, and there's always the two-book series. Sometimes two books are all that's needed for a story to be completed :)
My recent post Giveaway: Bunheads by Sophie Flack!
me too

weird, as i dont even read them, haha.

but then, some series i want to go one forever (like, say, jaclyn moriarty's...)

anyways, it seems like overkill, some of them. then again, publishers must be digging them. or, well, someones reading them ;)
Two words:
Maximum. Ride.

Completely loved the kickass bird kids in the first book, less in the second, more in the third. Then the fourth book took a swan dive off a skyscraper and yet I've read two more after it. I finally put my foot down about the seventh installment, but I still see it winking at me sometimes in B&N.

I'm a big contemporary fan and because they're mostly stand alones I don't read too many series, but I still follow some religiously {i.e. The Mortal Instruments, The Infernal Devices, The Curse Workers series}. I guess for me it all depends on the series and if it's going to be two books long or twelve. I can't handle the Series That Never End.

LOVE this post. :)
My recent post Review: Past Perfect by Leila Sales!
This post has made me become a follower. I really dislike series. I tried it with Anita Blake and we all know where that one went. I tried the first and second Sookie book and I tried the first Kim Harrison book, oh yeah and Patricia Briggs. I just can't get myself invested in them enough to want to continue and follow them through years. I don't know, maybe Anita Blake burnt me out. I really prefer stand alone stories where things are wrapped up. If there is a "sequel" or "companion" I don't mind the same character's as you've said, but not the same story, just in a different package.
Me too! I have a whole list of series I'd like to read...but I keep avoiding them for some reason. It's like embraking on a (really) long journey that you're not sure if you're going to enjoy or not.
My recent post The Rogue Crew Quotes II
The frustrating thing about series is that it's just hard, if you're coming in later, to get all the books. Either the stores are stocking #1, #2, and #4, or the libraries only have #5, #9, and #11. And what if some of the books in the series go out of print? Ack.

I miss good, standalone books. There are some out there, but series are definitely taking over and maybe it's a way for publishing companies to guarantee dividends, etc.

Trilogies are a bit easier to handle, but some series have been going on for years and there are dozens of books included. It's hard to keep up and it's usually hard to get all of the books.
My recent post Uglee Pikcher Meme II
Also, so many of them spin off! It's overwhelming and too much.
My recent post Uglee Pikcher Meme II
Kelan O'Connell's avatar

Kelan O'Connell · 678 weeks ago

Thanks for this post.

As an Indie Author of a book that's considered a stand-alone, I get nervous about breaking away and writing for an entirely new set of characters. And yet, that's exactly what I plan to do. So, reading this post and comments that reveal how some avid readers and bloggers are getting tired of the whole series scene, makes me feel a bit better.

Yes, one day I plan to come back to the characters people have embraced, and I'm glad they want to read more with them, but frankly, for the moment, their story is done. I'll catch up with them down the line, once their lives have progressed and there are developments worth reporting, but there are other characters and other stories to be told. I guess the brand I'm creating is something of a cross between a stand-alone and a series. Time will tell.
We only represent women who truly enjoy the company of a gentleman and have a fantastic flair for the truly erotic. Indulge yourself in some sinning pleasures as our stunning.
I am Ravina Sahil sexy smart & high class female independent escorts in Agra, i am very famous among very fews for my Exceptional AgraEscort Service Girl.
jack smith's avatar

jack smith · 304 weeks ago

Post a new comment

Comments by